The purchase of a property in the defendant's name with money provided by the claimant had given rise to a resulting trust in the property and the proceeds of its subsequent sale, and the defendant's use of those proceeds to purchase a second property in his name, constituted a breach of trust. There was no evidence that the claimant had undertaken the role of a father so as to become in loco parentis to the defendant, and the presumption of advancement did not, therefore, apply.
Alexander Bastin represented Gardner & McCarthy in the High Court (Queen’s Bench Division). For further details, please refer to the full judgment: Samson v Gardner  EWHC 3369 (QB)
This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.
Please note that we do not give legal advice on individual cases which may relate to this content other than by way of formal instruction of a member of Hardwicke. However if you have any other queries about this content please contact: