Home > Mohammed & ors v CIS & anor

Mohammed & ors v CIS & anor

29th April 2013

Two Claimants alleged injuries and losses arising out of an RTA. The Defence alleged staged or otherwise fraudulent accident. The court struck out the entirety of the relevant claimant’s claims (including general and special damages) on an interlocutory application. The reason was the failure by C to give comprehensive disclosure of all documents relating to previous accidents.  The Judge said such failure undermined the ability of D to properly advance its case on general and special damages; and in a fraud claim the obligation to give comprehensive disclosure was paramount.

Colm Nugent acted for the Defendant RTA insurer. For more information, please refer to the full judgment.

This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.

Contact

Please note that we do not give legal advice on individual cases which may relate to this content other than by way of formal instruction of a member of Hardwicke.  However if you have any other queries about this content please contact:

Sally Wollaston
Sally Wollaston
Business Development and Marketing Director
Menu