Finally a decision on whether a bankrupt can be compelled to draw down a pension: The Court of Appeal has finally handed down its long-awaited judgment in Horton v Henry  EWCA Civ. 989, the case determining whether a Trustee in Bankruptcy can compel a Bankrupt to draw down his pension even though the pension is not in payment because the Bankrupt has elected not to call it down.
The Trustee maintained that he could do so in order to create a surplus income (which there would otherwise not be) and thus claim all or some of the pension pot by way of an income payments order pursuant to s 310 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (“the Act”).
At first instance the Trustee’s application was dismissed, but this conflicted with the earlier decision of Bernard Livesey QC in Raithatha v Williamson  EWHC 909 (Ch),  1 WLR 3559 (“Williamson”).
The unanimous decision of the Court of Appeal, dismissing the Trustee’s appeal, is in fact a complete vindication of Alaric Watson of Hardwicke’s position in Williamson. It is perhaps therefore a pity that the debtor’s appeal of the decision in Williamson was compromised, so that we have had to wait four years to discover that that wayward decision was wrong.
If you would like any further details on this matter, please contact Andrew Hall on 020 7242 2523 or Andrew.email@example.com
This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.
Please note that we do not give legal advice on individual cases which may relate to this content other than by way of formal instruction of a member of Hardwicke. However if you have any other queries about this content please contact: