Case Reference: The Halo Trust v The Secretary of State for International Development  EWHC 87 (TCC) 27/1/11
In 2010 the Department for International Development (DFID) undertook a public procurement exercise in relation to mine clearance and related work in Cambodia. Initially Framework Agreements were signed between DFID, the Claimant (C) and Mines Advisory Group (MAG) and G4S whereby they could be invited to participate in demining work globally. C believed that it should have “won” the contract and that there were breaches by DFID of the Public Contracts Regulations 2006 (as amended by the Public Contracts (Amendment) Regulations 2009) (“the Regulations”).
The court had to determine whether DFID should continue, at the suit of C, to be restrained by the operation of Regulation 47H of the Regulations from placing its contract with MAG for £3.5m’s worth of work in relation to the demining work. It was common ground that in relation to applications under Regulation 47G(1) as here the Court should apply the principles and practice set out in American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon  AC 396.
There was no serious issue to be tried in respect of the alleged breaches of the Regulations but, even were that threshold passed, the balance of convenience was such that DFID should no longer be restrained from entering into its proposed contract with MAG.
This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.
Please note that we do not give legal advice on individual cases which may relate to this content other than by way of formal instruction of a member of Hardwicke. However if you have any other queries about this content please contact: