Subject: Construction, Adjudication, Enforcement, Crystallisation, Jurisdiction and Severability.
The Claimant (“C”) engaged the Defendant (“D”) to undertake flooring works. A dispute arose and was referred to adjudication; the adjudicator made an award in C’s favour. D sought to challenge enforcement of the adjudicator’s decision on the basis that it contended that a significant part of C’s claim relating to liquidated damages had not crystallised prior to the dispute being referred to adjudication. C argued that even if that were the case, the remainder of the adjudicator’s decision was severable and should be enforced.
Held (1) A dispute had clearly crystallised between the parties before the dispute had been referred to adjudication; however, the addition of the claim for liquidated damages was a late addition and had not been notified in sufficient time to crystallise prior to the referral (2) the claim for liquidated damages was separate to the remainder of the claim and was treated separately in the adjudicator’s decision. The Court could and would sever and enforce the remainder.
Michael Wheater represented the Claimant. For further details, please view the full judgment for Beck Interiors Ltd v UK Flooring Contractors Ltd  EWHC 1808 (TCC),  CILL 3209.
This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.
Please note that we do not give legal advice on individual cases which may relate to this content other than by way of formal instruction of a member of Hardwicke. However if you have any other queries about this content please contact: