Home > Our people > Barristers > Jack Dillon
Jack Dillon
  • We take data and privacy issues very seriously. See our privacy policy.

Jack specialises in commercial litigation, property law and professional negligence.  He has developed a strong advisory practice and frequently appears as advocate in the High Court and County Courts, specialist tribunals, particularly the First-tier Tribunal and at mediation.  Jack is a firm advocate and prides himself on giving on giving considered, clear and pragmatic advice.

In addition to his own practice, Jack has also acted as junior to members of chambers in several cases including, most recently, a four-week trial in the Commercial Court in Sheikh Tahnoon v Kent [2018] EWHC 333 (Comm).

Jack is a member of Hardwicke’s Commercial Dispute Resolution, Property and Professional Liability teams.  He frequently gives seminars and other training as part of Hardwicke’s training programme, the Junior to Junior programme, and for external organisations.

Commercial Litigation

Jack is a member of Hardwicke’s Commercial Dispute Resolution team.  He has developed a general commercial practice in addition to having experience of more specialist arrears, such as fraud and asset recovery, claims against directors, claims arising out of joint ventures, franchising, banking and finance, employment and costs.  Jack has experience of claims for injunctive relief, such as search orders, ‘dawn raid’ injunctions and freezing injunctions.

Jack acts as sole counsel in the High Court as well as having acted as junior counsel in high value Commercial Court litigation.  He has dealt with claims involving serious allegations such as fraud, dishonesty, duress and intimidation.  Jack has considerable experience of asset recovery.

Jack understands the need both for a pragmatic approach to commercial disputes and to explore various methods of dispute resolution.

Recent and current instructions include:

  • La Cotte v Sovereign – £1.6m fraud claim relating to an alleged scrap metal management joint venture
  • Sheikh Tahnoon v Kent [2018] EWHC 333 (Comm) –junior counsel in a four week Commercial Court trial before Leggatt J over dissolution of a joint venture acquiring Mediterranean hotels, involving fiduciary duties, implied contractual duty of good faith in relational contracts, blackmail, and causation requirements in cases of physical intimidation/duress
  • Sheikh Tahnoon v Kent [2018] EWHC 614 (Comm) – consequential judgment concerning the overall successor in the litigation, proportionate costs order and permission to appeal
  • Eerenstein v Baldelli & anors – claim for conspiracy and fraud resulting in lost earnings of £900k
  • Advice concerning issues arising in relation to a witness’s evidence and privilege in a high-value commercial arbitration
  • Poyser v Ariadne – two-day trial acting for director claiming unpaid salary over £100k against former employers
  • River Mounts Jewellery v Maxell Aylwin – successful appeal against a decision to permit relief from sanctions in a claim for the value of jewellery leading to strike out
  • Marshall v Tesco – trial of preliminary issue in claim by credit card holder against bank over defective solar panels, s.12, 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974
  • Wood v Indigo Bridge successfully opposed a pre-action disclosure application in relation to a development joint venture
  • Hussain & Hussain v Rivzi & Dallas Chicken and Ribs Ltd – successful application to strike out a claim brought against a franchisor arising out of a sale of the franchise. Jack acted as sole counsel against a commercial silk

Commercial Landlord & Tenant

Jack accepts instructions to act in all types of commercial landlord and tenant disputes, including rent, disrepair, breach of covenant, forfeiture proceedings, possession and reinstatement injunctions.

Recent and current instructions include:

  • Sunflower v Willow – obtaining without notice injunctive relief requiring management company to reconnect electricity supply
  • Four Seasons v Morden Properties Ltd – acting for landlord opposing urgent application on two hours’ notice for an injunction to reinstate
  • Sangerwal v Sparquote – opposed urgent application for injunctive relief allowing financial services user
  • Home Bargains v A – acted for landlord in roof disrepair claim for loss of profits
  • Karol v BCF – service charge dispute
  • Lookmark v Attwall & anors – acted for the landlord opposing application for an injunction requiring reinstatement following re-entry
  • Carphone Warehouse v Coal Pension Properties – LTA 1954 renewal
  • Proxima v Daulatzai – claim for damages for trespass and injunctive relief after a licence to use an outdoor was revoked

Housing (Social & Privately Rented)

Jack’s property practice encompasses disputes between residential landlords and tenants relating to all kinds of tenancies.  (For long residential leases, please see his Leasehold & Leasehold Management tab).  These include possession proceedings, anti-social behaviour injunctions, and contempt and committal proceedings.  He acts for private landlords, local authorities, housing associations and managing agents and also for tenants.

Recent and current instructions include:

  • Metropolitan v Dosso – possession order for subletting and unlawful profit order over £30k for “blatant and reprehensible” breach
  • Billericay Housing Co-Op v Bunting – two-day County Court trial concerning succession under the Rent Act 1977
  • Hyde v Harris anti-social behaviour claim involving exclusion order, defendant with mental health issues
  • LB Sutton v Dorling – acted for landlord in anti-social behaviour issue, violent elderly tenant committed for contempt
  • Newlon v Angol – committal proceedings concerning capacity to understanding injunction
  • Metropolitan v A – claim possession with public law defence relating to defendant’s schizophrenia
  • Metropolitan v Olivacce – limited civil restraint order made against tenant for repeated applications to stay without merit
  • London & Quadrant v Barnett – acted for landlord in claim for possession on the grounds of drugs related crime
  • Metropolitan v Murray – anti-social behaviour injunction, exclusion order made following arson threats
  • LB Sutton v Nixon – committal proceedings
  • Hussain v Hunter – successfully opposed application for relief from sanctions on an appeal against decision not to set aside a possession order

Leasehold & Leasehold Management

Jack accepts instructions concerning all issues arising out of long residential leases.  He has a wide experience of forfeiture proceedings and relief applications, right to manage, individual and collective enfranchisement, service charge disputes, applications to determine breaches, and anti-social behaviour and nuisance proceedings.  Jack acts for corporate and individual lessors, lessees and management companies. He frequently appears in the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property) in addition to the civil courts.

Recent and current instructions include:

  • Marksglade v Edun – application for determination of breach regarding improvement
  • Eerenstein v Baldeli – successful opposition to appeal against applications to set aside default judgments in service charge proceedings issued after the death of one of the lessor’s
  • Imagine v Bedwin St – acting for tenant in two-day FTT trial concerning service charges, major works, s.20ZA LTA 1985 dispensation, s.20 LTA 1985 order
  • Shimizu v Blumenthals – service charge dispute
  • Anjarwalla v 5 Warrington Crescent – acting for lessee successfully defending claim for service charges owed by predecessor, recovered costs, s.20C LTA 1985 order
  • Jobanputra v Dimitriadis – trial of leasehold enfranchisement claim
  • Holding v Aderohunmu-Adeniyi – claim under rent charge
  • FIT Nominees v Spencer – service charge dispute
  • Learner v Clauson – acted for the landlord in a residential dilapidations claim settled at over £50k
  • Point West v Zaman – dispute over service of demands for service charges
  • Richards v Torplus – appeared for the tenant in a successful challenge to all service charges, recovered full costs

Real Property & Mortgages

Jack’s practice covers real property and mortgage work.  He has an advisory and court practice in relation to adverse possession, trespassers, options, easements, rent charges, property damage and boundary disputes. In relation to mortgages he handles enforcement proceedings, possession and receivership claims, issues related to priority of interests and defective charges, s.36 AJA 1970 and injunctive relief.  Recent and current instructions include:

  • Numerous High Court possession proceedings against defendants trespassing and fly-tipping in green and warehouse spaces owned by a London Borough
  • Sparquote v Sangerwal – acted for the landlord opposing application for interim injunctive relief permitting tenant’s re-entry into premises used for banking services
  • Advice in relation to freehold ownership of a cricket recreation ground in Wales, involving consideration of history over conveyances over 30 years
  • Natwest v Mokarram – claim for injunctive relief preventing interference with sale of property
  • Pearson v Mortgage Works – successfully opposed High Court claim for injunctive relief against receivers restraining dealing with property
  • Harris v Morrin – acted for landowner in relation to claim for injunctive relief restraining neighbour’s trespass and boundary claim
  • Wood & anors v Sammons – application to postpone date for possession under order for sale made following fraud proceedings for £1.5m related to a painting

Trusts of Land

Jack has acted in numerous disputes between co-owners of land regarding their beneficial ownership, involving express trusts, common intention constructive trusts and resulting trusts.  He understands the legal, evidential and strategic issues specific to these types of dispute.  He appears in the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Land Registration). Recent and current instructions include:

  • Chopra v Chopra – various dispute over ownership of properties in a residential property portfolio
  • Summerfield v Herne – acted for registered proprietor in claim for possession, defended on basis of beneficial interest and/or proprietary estoppel arising out of development joint venture

Property Professionals

Jack accepts instructions in professional negligence claims against property professionals, such as surveyors, architects and estate agents.

Financial Professionals, Insolvency Professionals, Directors & Officers

Jack accepts instructions in professional negligence claims against financial advisers, tax advisers, accountants, insurance brokers, directors & officers, and trustees & executors.

Professional Indemnity Insurance

Jack has developed a practice advising insurers in relation to coverage issues arising out of professional indemnity insurance policies alongside his professional negligence practice.

He is a contributor to Contributor to Construction Professional indemnity Insurance (1st edition, 2018).

Professional associations

  • Commercial Bar Association
  • Property Bar Association
  • London Common Law & Commercial Bar Association
  • Professional Negligence Bar Association
  • Young Fraud Lawyers Association

Publications

Qualifications

  • City Law School, GDL & BPTC (Outstanding) – Senior Scarman Award, Stephen Seabrooke Memorial Prize, Lord Denning Scholarship.
  • University of Bristol, BA Hons (History) (First) – highest dissertation.

CSR

Jack is an active member of Advocate (formerly the Bar Pro Bono Unit).

Menu