A leading set specialising in commercial, construction, insurance and property law
Following a dispute regarding certain share options granted to the Defendant, a former employee domiciled in the Netherlands, the Claimants sued the Defendant in England for declaratory relief. The Defendant successfully challenged the jurisdiction of the English court under Section 5 of the Recast Brussels Regulation which requires an employer to sue its employee in the employee’s place of domicile.
In order to avoid exchange rates losses, the Defendant sought and was awarded his costs of the application in Euros. He had engaged a firm in Amsterdam. When proceedings were issued they had worked with their London office but the Defendant was billed throughout in Euros. The First Claimant was also domiciled in the Netherlands (the Second Claimant was domiciled in Guernsey).
Counsel for the Defendant, Stephen Brown of Hardwicke, argued that the Court had the power to make an award in a foreign currency (citing Miliangos) and that this was preferable to making an additional order in respect of exchange rate losses. The First Claimant was also based in the Eurozone and as an international hotel chain would lose nothing by being ordered to pay in Euros.
This content is provided free of charge for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. No responsibility for the accuracy and/or correctness of the information and commentary set out in the article, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed or accepted by any member of Chambers or by Chambers as a whole.
Please note that we do not give legal advice on individual cases which may relate to this content other than by way of formal instruction of a member of Hardwicke. However if you have any other queries about this content please contact: